We've known for decades that the folks really getting screwed by affirmative action are "poor whites." Not professional-class whites. Not liberal whites. Just the God-and-guns whites.
But nobody does anything about it.
There's a recent update on "diversity," the name given to affirmative action after the Supreme Court decided the Bakke case. It's a study on admissions at eight selective colleges by Thomas Espenshade and Alexandria Radford of Princeton, reported by Russell K. Nieli. Yep, poor whites get royally screwed as we knew. But here's another category that get pushed to the back of the line: students with extracurriculars in JROTC, 4-H, and Future Farmers of America.
Here's what liberal admissions officers do to get their numbers right, with 5-7 percent black and appropriate Hispanic admissions (By the way, you can count Afro-Caribbean and African immigrants as "black").
Black: "Enormous advantage over whites given to blacks": +310 SAT pts advantage over whites.
Hispanic: "substantial admissions boost... which Hispanic students get over whites": +140 SAT pts advantage over whites.
Asians: "must do substantially better than whites": -140 SAT pts disadvantage vs. whites
If you start counting by class, then poor whites get clobbered in their chances for admission:
Lower-class blacks: "ten times as likely" to get admission as lower-class whites.
Lower-class Hispanics: "eight times as likely" to get admission as lower-class whites.
Lower-class Asians: "seven times as likely" to get admission as lower-class whites.
Then there's the penalty for conservative extracurriculars:
"Being an officer or winning awards" for such career-oriented activities as junior ROTC, 4-H, or Future Farmers of America, say Espenshade and Radford, "has a significantly negative association with admission outcomes at highly selective institutions." Excelling in these activities "is associated with 60 or 65 percent lower odds of admission.
Maybe these liberal college admissions administrators need to study up the law of the land, as promulgated recently by the US Supreme Court.
[T]he way “to achieve a system of determining admission to the public schools on a nonracial basis,” Brown II, 349 U. S., at 300–301, is to stop assigning students on a racial basis. The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.
Justice is justice, but injustice cries up to the heavens for redress. One day, the heavens will call down the most frightful retribution on the monstrous injustice of liberal "diversity," the injustice that poor whites have borne for so long with such patience.